<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox Add-ons may make your computer vulnerable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teknobites.com/2007/05/30/firefox-add-ons-may-make-your-computer-vulnerable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teknobites.com/2007/05/30/firefox-add-ons-may-make-your-computer-vulnerable/</link>
	<description>Technology, Software, Internet, Android, Windows</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:45:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan Dickenson</title>
		<link>http://www.teknobites.com/2007/05/30/firefox-add-ons-may-make-your-computer-vulnerable/#comment-4073</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan Dickenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 07:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teknobites.com/2007/05/30/firefox-add-ons-may-make-your-computer-vulnerable/#comment-4073</guid>
		<description>The headline of your article and some parts in the body of your article seem to contradict the statement quoted.  It sounds like Mozilla was the only organization that was willing to work with the man and that somehow gets twisted into &#039;Firefox add-ons may make your computer vulnerable&#039;?  I don&#039;t get it???  

Ethan Dickenson, Author, Today&#039;s &#039;Best of Breed&#039;
~~~~~A suite of freeware for Windows~~~~~
http://todaysbestofbreed.wordpress.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The headline of your article and some parts in the body of your article seem to contradict the statement quoted.  It sounds like Mozilla was the only organization that was willing to work with the man and that somehow gets twisted into &#8216;Firefox add-ons may make your computer vulnerable&#8217;?  I don&#8217;t get it???  </p>
<p>Ethan Dickenson, Author, Today&#8217;s &#8216;Best of Breed&#8217;<br />
~~~~~A suite of freeware for Windows~~~~~<br />
<a href="http://todaysbestofbreed.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://todaysbestofbreed.wordpress.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ram</title>
		<link>http://www.teknobites.com/2007/05/30/firefox-add-ons-may-make-your-computer-vulnerable/#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>ram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 16:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teknobites.com/2007/05/30/firefox-add-ons-may-make-your-computer-vulnerable/#comment-425</guid>
		<description>yaah ur right, if you use lot of extensions they will make firefox slow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yaah ur right, if you use lot of extensions they will make firefox slow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve S</title>
		<link>http://www.teknobites.com/2007/05/30/firefox-add-ons-may-make-your-computer-vulnerable/#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 04:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teknobites.com/2007/05/30/firefox-add-ons-may-make-your-computer-vulnerable/#comment-418</guid>
		<description>Yea, I used to run every extension under the sun. Ever since I went to Firefox 2.0, I&#039;ve cut I&#039;ve cut back substantially. Some of the plugins are really cool, but not worth opening yourself up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, I used to run every extension under the sun. Ever since I went to Firefox 2.0, I&#8217;ve cut I&#8217;ve cut back substantially. Some of the plugins are really cool, but not worth opening yourself up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

